Thomas Piketty
Malka Guillot
Jonathan Goupille-Lebret
Bertrand Garbinti
Antoine Bozio
Hakki Yazici
Slavík Ctirad
Kina Özlem
Tilman Graff
Tilman Graff
Yuri Ostrovsky
Martin Munk
Anton Heil
Maitreesh Ghatak
Robin Burgess
Oriana Bandiera
Claire Balboni
Jonna Olsson
Richard Foltyn
Minjie Deng
Iiyana Kuziemko
Elisa Jácome
Juan Pablo Rud
Bridget Hofmann
Sumaiya Rahman
Martin Nybom
Stephen Machin
Hans van Kippersluis
Anne C. Gielen
Espen Bratberg
Jo Blanden
Adrian Adermon
Maximilian Hell
Robert Manduca
Robert Manduca
Marta Morazzoni
Aadesh Gupta
David Wengrow
Damian Phelan
Amanda Dahlstrand
Andrea Guariso
Erika Deserranno
Lukas Hensel
Stefano Caria
Vrinda Mittal
Ararat Gocmen
Clara Martínez-Toledano
Yves Steinebach
Breno Sampaio
Joana Naritomi
Diogo Britto
François Gerard
Filippo Pallotti
Heather Sarsons
Kristóf Madarász
Anna Becker
Lucas Conwell
Michela Carlana
Katja Seim
Joao Granja
Jason Sockin
Todd Schoellman
Paolo Martellini
UCL Policy Lab
Natalia Ramondo
Javier Cravino
Vanessa Alviarez
Hugo Reis
Pedro Carneiro
Raul Santaeulalia-Llopis
Diego Restuccia
Chaoran Chen
Brad J. Hershbein
Claudia Macaluso
Chen Yeh
Xuan Tam
Xin Tang
Marina M. Tavares
Adrian Peralta-Alva
Carlos Carillo-Tudela
Felix Koenig
Joze Sambt
Ronald Lee
James Sefton
David McCarthy
Bledi Taska
Carter Braxton
Alp Simsek
Plamen T. Nenov
Gabriel Chodorow-Reich
Virgiliu Midrigan
Corina Boar
Sauro Mocetti
Guglielmo Barone
Steven J. Davis
Nicholas Bloom
José María Barrero
Thomas Sampson
Adrien Matray
Natalie Bau
Suraj Sridhar
Attila Lindner
Arindrajit Dube
Pascual Restrepo
Łukasz Rachel
Benjamin Moll
Kirill Borusyak
Michael McMahon
Frederic Malherbe
Gabor Pinter
Angus Foulis
Saleem Bahaj
Stone Centre at UCL
Phil Thornton
James Baggaley
Xavier Jaravel
Richard Blundell
Parama Chaudhury
Dani Rodrik
Alan Olivi
Vincent Sterk
Davide Melcangi
Enrico Miglino
Fabian Kosse
Daniel Wilhelm
Azeem M. Shaikh
Joseph Romano
Magne Mogstad
Suresh Naidu
Ilyana Kuziemko
Daniel Herbst
Henry Farber
Lisa Windsteiger
Ruben Durante
Mathias Dolls
Cevat Giray Aksoy
Angel Sánchez
Penélope Hernández
Antonio Cabrales
Wendy Carlin
Suphanit Piyapromdee
Garud Iyengar
Willemien Kets
Rajiv Sethi
Ralph Luetticke
Benjamin Born
Amy Bogaard
Mattia Fochesato
Samuel Bowles
Guanyi Wang
CORE Econ
David Cai
Toru Kitagawa
Michela Tincani
Christian Bayer
Arun Advani
Elliott Ash
Imran Rasul

Train to opportunity: the effect of infrastructure on intergenerational mobility

What is this research about and why did you do it?

Can transport infrastructure promote long-term labor market opportunities and sever the occupational tie between parents and their children? While the economic impacts of transport infrastructure have received significant attention, the focus has generally been on aggregate outcomes or providing a snapshot of individual level outcomes at a given point in time. Much less is known about how access to transport infrastructure affects individuals’ economic opportunities, especially in the long run. Yet, transport infrastructure arguably improves individuals’ economic opportunities by connecting them to employment possibilities that are farther away, and by creating better options locally.

How did you answer this question?

We use census data from England and Wales in 1851-1911 to create a new dataset of close to one million father-son pairs where we observe their occupations at similar points in life. Using a simulated railway network, we estimate the effect of growing up closer to a train station on occupational and geographical mobility.

What did you find?

We find that individuals who grew up closer to a train station were more likely to work in a different occupation to their father. Better connected sons were also more likely to experience mobility "up the occupational ladder", particularly those whose fathers had occupations at the middle of the socio-economic distribution. Of course, this begs the question as to whether this ‘rail opportunity effect’ materialised because of improved geographical mobility. While we find that growing up closer to a train station has some positive effect on geographical mobility, most of the effect on occupational mobility takes place through improved local opportunities. This supports the notion of the railway creating socio-economic opportunities by improving local conditions.

Occupational mobility. The map shows the probability of father and sons working in different, detailed, occupations. These probabilities are computed at the parish level. Parishes are those used in the 1851 Census.

What implications does this have for the research on socio-economic mobility?

The British Industrial Revolution was a time of profound social, economic, and political change: it weakened the relationship between father's and son's occupation and the development of the railroad was an important driver of this transition. Better understanding the long-run implications of infrastructure improvements for individuals' socio-economic opportunities is of interest not only for historical reasons but also in terms of current debate. We show that a specific infrastructure improvement - the railroad - has large, localized and heterogeneous effects on social mobility. While the evidence is based on nineteenth century England and Wales, the broad channels we identify may be relevant when considering the potential impact of current infrastructure investments on local community development.

What are the next steps in your agenda?

Most research on socio-economic mobility, particularly from a historical perspective, is male-centric. In ongoing work we try to narrow this gap by documenting women's social mobility and emancipation at the turn of the twentieth century.

Citation

This paper can be cited as follows: Costas-Fernández, J. (2022) "Train to opportunity: the effect of infrastructure on intergenerational mobility." Working paper

About the authors